Search databaseBooksAll DatabasesAssemblyBiocollectionsBioProjectBioSampleBioSystemsBooksClinVarConserved DomainsdbGaPdbVarGeneGenomeGEO DataSetsGEO ProfilesGTRHomoloGeneIdentical Protein web CatalogNucleotideOMIMPMCPopSetProteinProtein ClustersProtein household ModelsPubChem BioAssayPubChem CompoundPubChem SubstancePubMedSNPSRAStructureTaxonomyToolKitToolKitAllToolKitBookgh Bookshelf. A organization of the national Library of Medicine, national Institutes that Health.

You are watching: What are the three factors influencing laboratory diagnostics?

Committee ~ above Diagnostic Error in health and wellness Care; plank on Health care Services; academy of Medicine; The nationwide Academies the Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Balogh EP, miller BT, sphere JR, editors. Enhancing Diagnosis in wellness Care. Washington (DC): nationwide Academies push (US); 2015 Dec 29.


Committee ~ above Diagnostic Error in health Care; plank on Health care Services; institute of Medicine; The nationwide Academies the Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Balogh EP, müller BT, round JR, editors.

This thing provides an overview of diagnosis in health care, including the committee"s theoretical model the the diagnostic process and a review of clinical reasoning. Diagnosis has crucial implications because that patient care, research, and policy. Diagnosis has actually been defined as both a procedure and a group scheme, or a “pre-existing set of categories agreed upon by the clinical profession come designate a particular condition” (Jutel, 2009).1 once a diagnosis is accurate and made in a timely manner, a patient has the ideal opportunity because that a positive health and wellness outcome because clinical decision making will certainly be tailored come a correct knowledge of the patient"s health difficulty (Holmboe and Durning, 2014). In addition, public plan decisions are often influenced through diagnostic information, such as setup payment policies, resource allocation decisions, and also research priorities (Jutel, 2009; Rosenberg, 2002; WHO, 2012).

The chapter explains important considerations in the diagnostic process, such as the duties of diagnostic uncertainty and also time. It also highlights the mounting complexity of health care, due to the ever-increasing alternatives for diagnostic testing2 and treatment, the promptly rising level of biomedical and also clinical proof to educate clinical practice, and also the constant comorbidities among patients due to the aging that the populace (IOM, 2008, 2013b). The rising complexity of wellness care and also the slim volume the advances, coupled through clinician time constraints and also cognitive limitations, have actually outstripped human being capacity to apply this brand-new knowledge. To help manage this complexity, the thing concludes with a discussion of the duty of clinical practice guidelines in informing decision make in the diagnostic process.


To aid frame and organize that work, the committee emerged a theoretical model to show the diagnostic procedure (see number 2-1). The committee concluded that the diagnostic procedure is a complex, patient-centered, collaborative activity that involves information gathering and also clinical reasoning with the goal of determining a patient"s health and wellness problem. This process occurs over time, in ~ the context of a bigger health care work device that impacts the diagnostic procedure (see crate 2-1). The committee"s relenten of the diagnostic procedure draws on an adaptation the a decision-making version that describes the cyclical process of information gathering, info integration and interpretation, and also forming a functioning diagnosis (Parasuraman et al., 2000; Sarter, 2014).



The committee"s conceptualization the the diagnostic process.

The diagnostic procedure proceeds as follows: First, a patient experiences a health problem. The patience is likely the an initial person to take into consideration his or her symptoms and also may choose at this allude to communicate with the health treatment system. As soon as a patient seeks health and wellness care, over there is an iterative process of details gathering, info integration and interpretation, and determining a working diagnosis. Performing a clinical history and interview, conducting a physical exam, performing diagnostic testing, and referring or consulting with other clinicians room all means of accumulating details that may be pertinent to knowledge a patient"s health problem. The information-gathering approaches deserve to be work at various times, and diagnostic information deserve to be acquired in different orders. The consistent process of info gathering, integration, and also interpretation entails hypothesis generation and also updating front probabilities as much more information is learned. Communication amongst health treatment professionals, the patient, and also the patient"s household members is vital in this bike of info gathering, integration, and interpretation.

The functioning diagnosis might be either a list of potential diagnoses (a differential diagnosis) or a single potential diagnosis. Typically, clinicians will certainly consider more than one diagnostic hypothesis or possibility as one explanation the the patient"s symptoms and also will filter this list as more information is acquired in the diagnostic process. The working diagnosis must be common with the patient, including an explanation the the degree of uncertainty associated with a functioning diagnosis. Every time there is a review to the working diagnosis, this details should be connected to the patient. Together the diagnostic process proceeds, a relatively broad list of potential diagnoses might be narrowed into fewer potential options, a process referred to together diagnostic alteration and refinement (Kassirer et al., 2010). As the perform becomes narrowed to one or two possibilities, diagnostic refinement the the working diagnosis i do not care diagnostic verification, in which the lead diagnosis is checked for the adequacy in explaining the signs and also symptoms, that is coherency through the patient"s paper definition (physiology, risk factors), and whether a single diagnosis is appropriate. When considering invasive or risky diagnostic trial and error or treatment options, the diagnostic verification step is particularly important so that a patience is no exposed come these threats without a reasonable opportunity that the testing or treatment choices will be informative and also will likely enhance patient outcomes.

Throughout the diagnostic process, there is an recurring assessment of whether adequate information has been collected. If the diagnostic team members space not satisfied the the essential information has been built up to explain the patient"s health trouble or that the information obtainable is not continuous with a diagnosis, then the process of info gathering, details integration and interpretation, and also developing a working diagnosis continues. When the diagnostic team members judge that they have actually arrived at precise and timely explanation of the patient"s wellness problem, they interact that explanation come the patient together the diagnosis.

It is crucial to keep in mind that clinicians do not require to acquire diagnostic certainty prior to initiating treatment; the goal of information gathering in the diagnostic process is to alleviate diagnostic uncertainty sufficient to make optimal decisions for subsequent treatment (Kassirer, 1989; see ar on diagnostic uncertainty). In addition, the delivery of treatment can additionally inform and refine a working diagnosis, i m sorry is shown by the feedback loop from treatment into the information-gathering step of the diagnostic process. This additionally illustrates the require for clinicians come diagnose health difficulties that might arise throughout treatment.

The committee figured out four types of information-gathering tasks in the diagnostic process: taking a clinical background and interview; performing a physics exam; obtaining diagnostic testing; and sending a patient for referrals or consultations. The diagnostic procedure is intended come be extensively applicable, including the provision of mental health care. These information-gathering processes are discussed in further information below.

Clinical background and Interview

Acquiring a clinical history and interviewing a patient provides vital information for determining a diagnosis and also establishes a solid structure for the relationship between a clinician and the patient. A typical maxim in medicine attributed to wilhelm Osler is: “Just listen to her patient, that is telling you the diagnosis” (Gandhi, 2000, p. 1087). An appointment starts with one interview of the patient, when a clinician compiles a patient"s medical background or verifies the the details of the patient"s background already contained in the patient"s clinical record space accurate. A patient"s clinical background includes documentation of the present concern, past clinical history, household history, social history, and other relevant information, such as present medications (prescription and over-the-counter) and dietary supplements.

The process of acquiring a clinical background and interviewing a patient requires reliable communication, energetic listening skills, and tailoring interaction to the patient based on the patient"s needs, values, and also preferences. The national Institute top top Aging, in guidance because that conducting a clinical history and interview, suggests that clinicians need to avoid interrupting, show empathy, and also establish a rapport v patients (NIA, 2008). Clinicians require to recognize when come ask much more detailed questions and also how to produce a safe environment for patient to share perceptible information around their health and symptoms. Obtaining a history can be difficult in part cases: for example, in working v older adults v memory loss, v children, or with people whose health problems limit interaction or trusted self-reporting. In these situations it may be crucial to encompass family members or caregivers in the history-taking process. The moment pressures often associated in clinical appointments likewise contribute to obstacles in the clinical background and interview. Minimal time because that clinical visits, partly attributed come payment policies (see thing 7), may lead to an incomplete picture of a patient"s relevant history and existing signs and also symptoms.

There room growing concerns that timeless “bedside evaluation” an abilities (history, interview, and also physical exam) have actually received much less attention due the huge growth in diagnostic experimentation in medicine. Verghese and colleagues provided that these approaches were once the main tools for diagnosis and also clinical evaluation, but “the current explosion of imaging and laboratory testing has inverted the diagnostic paradigm. regularly bypass the bedside testimonial for instant testing” (Verghese et al., 2011, p. 550). The interview has been called a clinician"s many versatile diagnostic and also therapeutic tool, and the clinical history provides direction for succeeding information-gathering activities in the diagnostic procedure (Lichstein, 1990). One accurate background facilitates a more productive and also efficient physics exam and also the proper utilization of diagnostic experimentation (Lichstein, 1990). Indeed, Kassirer concluded: “Diagnosis remains essentially dependent ~ above a personal interaction the a through a patient, the sufficiency that communication between them, the accuracy the the patient"s history and physical examination, and also the cognitive power necessary to synthesize a huge array that information” (Kassirer, 2014, p. 12).

Physical Exam

The physical test is a manual observational examination of the patient. First, a clinician observes a patient"s demeanor, complexion, posture, level the distress, and other signs that may contribute to an knowledge of the health trouble (Davies and also Rees, 2010). If the clinician has seen the patience before, these observations deserve to be weighed against previous interactions v the patient. A physical test may include an analysis of plenty of parts that the body, not just those suspected to be affiliated in the patient"s current complaint. A mindful physical exam can assist a clinician refine the next actions in the diagnostic process, have the right to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing, and can aid in structure trust v the patience (Verghese, 2011). Over there is no universally agreed upon physics examination checklist; myriad versions exist online and in textbooks.

Due to the growing emphasis on diagnostic testing, there are pertains to that physics exam an abilities have to be underemphasized in present health care professional education and also training (Kassirer, 2014; Kugler and also Verghese, 2010). For example, Kugler and also Verghese have asserted the there is a high level in variability in the means that trainees elicit physics signs and also that residency programs have actually not done enough to evaluate and improve physical exam techniques. Physicians at Stanford have arisen the “Stanford 25,” a perform of physics diagnostic maneuvers that are very technique-dependent (Verghese and also Horwitz, 2009). Educators watch students and residents performing these 25 maneuvers to ensure the trainees room able come elicit the physical indicators reliably (Stanford medication 25 Team, 2015).

Diagnostic Testing

Over the previous 100 years, diagnostic testing has become a vital feature of standard medical practice (Berger, 1999; European culture of Radiology, 2010). Diagnostic experimentation may occur in successive rounds of info gathering, integration, and interpretation, together each ring of info refines the working diagnosis. In countless cases, diagnostic trial and error can recognize a condition prior to it is clinically apparent; for example, coronary artery an illness can be established by one imaging research indicating the existence of coronary artery blockage even in the lack of symptoms.

The primary focus of this section focuses on activities medicine, anatomic pathology, and also medical imaging (see box 2-2). However, over there are many important creates of diagnostic testing that extend beyond these fields, and also the committee"s theoretical model is intended to be broadly applicable. Aditional develops of diagnostic trial and error include, because that example, screening tools used in do mental health diagnoses (SAMHSA and also HRSA, 2015), sleep apnea testing, neurocognitive assessment, and also vision and hearing testing.

Although the was arisen specifically for laboratory medicine, the brain-to-brain loop model is valuable for relenten the general process of diagnostic testing (Lundberg, 1981; Plebani et al., 2011). The model consists of nine steps: test choice and ordering, sample collection, patience identification, sample transportation, sample preparation, sample analysis, an outcome reporting, an outcome interpretation, and also clinical action (Lundberg, 1981). These measures occur during five phases of diagnostic testing: prepre-analytic, pre-analytic, analytic, post-analytic, and also post-post-analytic phases. Errors regarded diagnostic trial and error can take place in any type of of these five phases, but the analytic phase is the the very least susceptible to errors (Eichbaum et al., 2012; Epner et al., 2013; Laposata, 2010; Nichols and also Rauch, 2013; Stratton, 2011) (see thing 3).

The pre-pre-analytic phase, which entails clinician test an option and ordering, has been identified as a vital point of vulnerability in the work procedure due to the big number and variety of easily accessible tests, which provides it daunting for nonspecialist clinicians to accurately choose the correct check or collection of tests (Hickner et al., 2014; Laposata and Dighe, 2007). The pre-analytic phase entails sample collection, patience identification, sample transportation, and sample preparation. During the analysis phase, the specimen is tested, examined, or both. Sufficient performance in this phase relies on the correct execution of a chemical evaluation or morphological examination (Hollensead et al., 2004), and the contribution to diagnostic errors at this step is small. The post-analytic phase contains the generation the results, reporting, interpretation, and follow-up. Ensuring accurate and timely report from the laboratory to the bespeak clinician and patient is central to this phase. Throughout the post-post-analytic phase, the bespeak clinician, periodically in consultation v pathologists, incorporates the check results right into the patient"s clinical context, considers the probability of a specific diagnosis in light of the check results, and considers the harms and benefits that future tests and also treatments, offered the newly got information. Possible factors contributing to fail in this phase encompass an incorrect translate of the test an outcome by the ordering clinician or pathologist and the failure by the notified clinician to act ~ above the check results: for example, no ordering a follow-up check or not offering treatment continuous with the test outcomes (Hickner et al., 2014; Laposata and Dighe, 2007; Plebani and also Lippi, 2011).

The medical imaging work procedure parallels the work procedure described for pathology. There is a pre-pre-analytic step (the an option and notified of medical imaging), a pre-analytic step (preparing the patient because that imaging), one analytic step (image acquisition and analysis), a post-analytic phase (the imaging outcomes are interpreted and also reported come the notified clinician or the patient), and also a post-post-analytic step (the integration that results into the patient context and further action). The pertinent differences between the clinical imaging and also pathology processes incorporate the nature of the examination and also the techniques and an innovation used to analyze the results.

Laboratory Medicine and also Anatomic Pathology

In 2008 a Centers for an illness Control and also Prevention (CDC) report explained pathology together an “essential facet of the health care system,” stating that pathology is “integral to many clinical decisions, providing physicians, nurses, and also other health care providers with often pivotal information for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and also management that disease” (CDC, 2008, p. 19). Primary care clinicians order activities tests in slightly less than one 3rd of patient access time (CDC, 2010; Hickner et al., 2014), and also direct-to-patient experimentation is coming to be increasingly widespread (CDC, 2008). Over there are currently thousands of molecule diagnostic tests available, and also this number is supposed to increase as the instrument of disease at the molecular level are much better understood (CDC, 2008; Johansen Taber et al., 2014) (see crate 2-3).

The job of picking the appropriate diagnostic testing is an overwhelming for clinicians, in part because of the sheer volume that choices. Because that example, Hickner and also colleagues (2014) found that primary care clinicians report uncertainty in bespeak laboratory medicine tests in around 15 percent the diagnostic encounters. Choosing the proper test requires knowledge the patient"s background and present signs and symptoms, as well as having a adequate suspicion or pre-test probability the a disease or problem (see ar on probabilistic reasoning) (Pauker and also Kassirer, 1975, 1980; Sox, 1986). The likelihood of disease is inherently uncertain in this step; because that instance, the clinician"s patient populace may not reflect epidemiological data, and also the patient"s background can it is in incomplete or otherwise complicated. Developments in molecule diagnostic modern technologies and new diagnostic tests have introduced an additional layer the complexity. Many clinicians room struggling to keep up with the growing access of such tests and have uncertainty about the finest application of this tests in screening, diagnosis, and also treatment (IOM, 2015a; Johansen Taber et al., 2014).

Diagnostic tests have “operating parameters,” consisting of sensitivity and specificity that are certain to the diagnostic test because that a certain disorder (see ar on probabilistic reasoning). Also if a check is perform correctly, over there is a opportunity for a false positive or false an unfavorable result. Check interpretation requires reviewing numerical or qualitative (yes or no) results and also combining those results with patient history, symptoms, and pretest condition likelihood. Test interpretation requirements to it is in patient-specific and also to take into consideration information learned throughout the physics exam and the clinical history and interview. Numerous studies have highlighted test interpretation errors, such together the misinterpretation that a false positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening test because that a low-risk patient as indicative of HIV epidemic (Gigerenzer, 2013; Kleinman et al., 1998). In addition, check performance might only be defined in a limited patient population, top to obstacles with generalizability (Whiting et al., 2004).

The laboratories that conduct diagnostic testing are several of the many regulated and inspected locations in health care (see Table 2-1). Several of the relevant entities encompass The share Commission and also other accreditors, the commonwealth government, and various other organizations, such together the college of American Pathologists (CAP) and also the American culture for Clinical Pathology. Over there are plenty of ways in which top quality is assessed. Examples include proficiency trial and error of clinical activities assays and also pathologists (e.g., Pap smear capability testing), countless of which room regulated under the Clinical Laboratory improvement Amendments, and also inter-laboratory comparison programs (e.g., CAP"s Q-Probes, Q-Monitors, and Q-Tracks programs).

Medical Imaging

Medical imaging plays a an essential role in creating the diagnoses for innumerable conditions and also it is used routinely in almost every branch the medicine. The advance of imaging technologies has actually improved the capability of clinicians come detect, diagnose, and also treat conditions while also permitting patients to avoid much more invasive procedures (European society of Radiology, 2010; Gunderman, 2005). Because that many problems (e.g., brain tumors), imaging is the just noninvasive diagnostic technique available. The appropriate choice of imaging modality counts on the disease, organ, and certain clinical concerns to be addressed. Computed tomography (CT) and also magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) space first-line techniques for assessing problems of the main and peripheral concerned system, while for musculoskeletal and also a range of other conditions, X-ray and ultrasound are regularly employed first because the their relatively low cost and ready availability, with CT and also MRI being scheduled as problem-solving modalities. CT steps are frequently used come assess and also diagnose cancer, circulatory device diseases and conditions, inflammation diseases, and head and also internal body organ injuries. A majority of MRI measures are carry out on the spine, brain, and also musculoskeletal system, although intake for the breast, prostate, abdominal, and pelvic regions is increasing (IMV, 2014).

Medical imaging is identified not simply by the increasingly precise anatomic detail it uses but likewise by boosting capacity come illuminate biology. For example, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging has permitted the evaluate of metabolism, and also a growing number of other MRI order are giving information around functional characteristics, such as blood perfusion or water diffusion. In addition, several brand-new tracers because that molecular imaging with PET (typically together PET/CT) have actually recently been approved for clinical use, and much more are experience clinical trials, if PET/MRI was recently introduced to the clinical setting. Functional and molecular imaging data might be assessed qualitatively, quantitatively, or both. Although other forms of diagnostic experimentation can determine a broad array of molecule markers, molecular imaging is distinctive in its volume to noninvasively present the areas of molecular processes in patients, and also it is supposed to pat a vital role in advancing precision medicine, particularly for cancers, which often show both intra- and intertumoral organic heterogeneity (Hricak, 2011).

The farming body of medical knowledge, the selection of imaging options available, and the regular increases in the amounts and type of data that can be recorded with imaging present tremendous challenges for radiologists, together no individual have the right to be supposed to accomplish competency in all of the imaging modalities. Basic radiologists proceed to be necessary in details clinical settings, however extended training and also sub-specialization space often essential for optimal, clinically relevant image interpretation, as is authorized in multidisciplinary condition management teams. Furthermore, the usage of structured report templates tailored to specific examinations can assist to rise the clarity, thoroughness, and also clinical relevance of image interpretation (Schwartz et al., 2011).

Like other creates of diagnostic testing, medical imaging has limitations. Some researches have uncovered that in between 20 and 50 percent that all progressed imaging outcomes fail to carry out information that improves patient outcome, although these studies do not account for the value of an adverse imaging outcomes in influencing decisions about patient administration (Hendee et al., 2010). Imaging might fail to provide useful information since of modality sensitivity and specificity parameters; because that example, the spatial resolution of one MRI may not it is in high sufficient to recognize very tiny abnormalities. Poor patient education and also preparation for an imaging test can likewise lead to suboptimal imaging quality that results in diagnostic error.

Perceptual or cognitive errors made by radiologists are a source of diagnostic error (Berlin, 2014; Krupinski et al., 2012). In addition, incomplete or incorrect patience information, and insufficient share of patient information, may lead to the use of an poor imaging protocol, one incorrect interpretation of imaging results, or the choice of an inappropriate imaging test by a introduce clinician. Referring clinicians regularly struggle with picking the appropriate imaging test, in part because the the big number of accessible imaging options and gaps in the teaching of radiology in clinical schools. Back consensus-based guidelines (e.g., the various “appropriateness criteria” released by the American university of Radiology ) are available to aid select imaging tests for numerous conditions, this guidelines are often not followed. The use of clinical decision support systems in ~ the allude of care and also direct consultations v radiologists have been suggest by the ACR as methods for enhancing imaging test choice (Allen and also Thorwarth, 2014).

See more: Opie And Anthony Soundboard, Opie & Anthony Car Crash Sound Effect

There are several mechanisms because that ensuring the top quality of medical imaging. The Mammography quality Standards act (MQSA)—overseen through the Food and Drug Administration—was the very first government-mandated accreditation regimen for any kind of medical facility; the was focused on X-ray imaging for chest cancer. MQSA offers a general framework for ensuring nationwide quality requirements in framework that execute screening mammography (IOM, 2005). MQSA needs all personnel at facilities to satisfy initial qualifications, to demonstrate ongoing experience, and to finish continuing education. MQSA addresses protocol selection, photo acquisition, interpretation and report generation, and also the interaction of results and recommendations. In addition, it provides facilities v data ~ above diagnostic power that deserve to be supplied for benchmarking, self-monitoring, and improvement. MQSA has diminished the variability in mammography performed across the joined States and also improved the top quality of treatment (Allen and also Thorwarth, 2014). However, the ACR provided that MQSA is complex and stated in great detail, which renders it inflexible, top to bureaucratic burdens and the require for considerable training of employee for implementation (Allen and also Thorwarth, 2014). It additionally focuses on only one clinical imaging modality in one condition area; thus, the does not deal with newer screening technologies (IOM, 2005). In addition, the Medicare enhancements for Patients and Providers plot (MIPPA)3 needs that private outpatient framework that perform CT, MRI, chest MRI, nuclear medicine, and also PET exams it is in accredited. The requirements incorporate personnel qualifications, image quality, devices performance, security standards, and quality assurance and quality manage (ACR, 2015a). Over there are four CMS-designated accreditation institutions for clinical imaging: ACR, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, The share Commission, and also RadSite (CMS, 2015a). MIPPA additionally mandated that, beginning in 2017, notified clinicians will be compelled to top appropriateness criteria to order advanced medical imaging procedures, and also the act called for a demonstration project assessing clinician compliance v appropriateness criteria (Timbie et al., 2014). In addition to these mandated activities, societies such together ACR and the Radiological culture of north America (RSNA) administer quality improvement programs and also resources (ACR, 2015b; RSNA, 2015).